Updating copyright

So here’s the rundown of other elements on the copyright page: Think of the copyright page as the place where the publisher tries to get all its work done, take care of legal and bibliographic necessities, before getting out of the way of the author.

When you come to creating your own copyright page, pick the elements that seem most suitable to your book.

I’m going to use Android Studio as an example, but this works on Webstorm, etc. Licensed under the Apache License, Version 2.0 (the "License"); you may not use this file except in compliance with the License.

Open Android Studio and follow these setps in order to automagically generate copyright messages for all your project files. You may obtain a copy of the License at Unless required by applicable law or agreed to in writing, software distributed under the License is distributed on an "AS IS" BASIS, WITHOUT WARRANTIES OR CONDITIONS OF ANY KIND, either express or implied.

As we hit the mid-year mark and the legislative days remaining on the Congressional calendar dwindle, it makes sense to revisit these bills with an eye toward what may or may not move forward in the coming weeks and months.

Now I’d like to look at the all-important copyright page in a little more detail.

The diversity and breadth of support for the bill is so unheralded that it has resulted in unanimous passage in every instance it has been considered by Congress.

Here’s a look at the timeline: The bill continues to move toward a floor vote.

Given the results when the bill was first considered by the House, it seems certain that it will pass the House and then land on the President’s desk to be signed into law at some point later this year. At the time, this was a significant accomplishment, as it represented the most substantive, stand-alone copyright bill to pass through the House in a decade (since the PRO-IP Act, which passed in 2008). 1695 headed to the Senate for approval where it was joined by companion bill S. Instead of being referred to the Senate Judiciary Committee, where virtually all copyright bills are sent, the bill was referred to the Senate Rules Committee.

Of course, now this feat is somewhat less impressive when compared to the tremendous support received for the MMA in the House. The Rules Committee rarely considers legislation relating to copyright or the U. Copyright Office, and therefore there was a significant learning curve for the Committee staff that took up most of the second half of 2017.

Leave a Reply