Validating identity on network
A project with a map named Distribution Map has been authored and shared with the rest of the organization.As a member of the organization, you will use this map to complete your work in your own version.As portions of the network that are edited or modified they become out of date in the network topology and are marked with dirty areas.The dirty areas indicate the content you see in a map does not match what is stored in the network topology.The biggest contribution of blockchain technologies was that, for the first time in the history of computer science, we have a model in which we can trust math and cryptography instead of centralized parties.Using that principle as a foundation, blockchain architectures evolved based on consensus protocols such as proof-of-work(Po W) or proof-of-stake(Po S) that rely on computations in order to make decisions.
When a network topology is enabled it is updated to reflect the state of the network at that point in time.
When editing in the Default version, edits are automatically saved and cannot be undone.
The following workflow demonstrates the order of operations for performing edits and validating the network topology in a child user version.
If look at the current spectrum of identity management architectures in the enterprise, there are a few characteristics that are worth highlighting:· Based on Centralized Identity Providers: Enterprise identity management solutions typically rely on centralized identity providers that receive some form of user credentials as input and output an identity token.· Based on Identity Protocols: At the moment, a significant percentage of enterprise identity management solutions leverage protocols like SAML, OAuth2 for its interactions.· Fractionalized: The identity of users in enterprise environments is spread across different line of business systems or user directories.
As a result, different applications tend to interact with different representations of a user’s identity.